Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -TradeCircle
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-18 21:46:47
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Loch Ness monster hunters join largest search of Scottish lake in 50 years
- Spanish soccer federation officials call for Luis Rubiales' resignation
- Miley Cyrus says she and dad Billy Ray Cyrus have 'wildly different' relationships to fame
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- Six St. Louis inmates face charges stemming from abduction of jail guard
- Philadelphia school district offering to pay parents $3,000 a year to take kids to school
- The 34 Most Popular Amazon Items E! Readers Bought This Month
- 'Most Whopper
- Retired US swimming champion's death in US Virgin Islands caused by fentanyl intoxication
Ranking
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Leon Panetta on the fate of Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin: If you cross Putin, the likelihood is you're going to die
- 'The wrong home': South Carolina student fatally shot, killed outside neighbor's house
- Former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows takes the stand in Georgia case
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Julianne Hough Reunites With Ex Brooks Laich at Brother Derek Hough's Wedding
- Pilot killed in combat jet crash near San Diego base identified as Maj. Andrew Mettler, Marine known as Simple Jack
- Steve Harvey and Wife Marjorie Call Out Foolishness and Lies Amid Claims She Cheated on Him
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
'Big wave:' College tennis has become a legitimate path to the pro level
A rare look at a draft of Martin Luther King Jr.'s historic I Have a Dream speech
Pipe Dreamer crew reels in 889-pound blue marlin, earns $1.18M in Mid-Atlantic event
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
The Ultimatum Franchise Status Check: Find Out Who's Still Together
After Supreme Court curtails federal power, Biden administration weakens water protections
Indiana police arrest 2nd man in July shooting at massive block party that killed 1, injured 17